Thursday, July 31, 2014

And an Interview will lead the nose...

What's up minions?

Have you all heard about Rob's Esquire interview?  

muahahahaha....yes I'm certain you've read it, heard about it and so forth and so on...LOL

Well it's certainly been the talk of the fandom for the last several days and I discussed it with many of you on Tuesday thinking we'd covered just about all there was to say only to wake up yesterday with my inbox FULL! 

First, I just want to applaud my fellow Rob and Kristen fans because most of you called a spade a spade and saw the Esquire article for what it was!  I had very few "oh woe is me" comments in my inbox...and who knows the few I had may very well have been from the FAINTERS just disquising themselves as distraught fans.  

I was not originally planning on beginning this post quite this way when I decided this was how I was going to handle my full inbox...but this morning after one particular comment this is how I'm choosing to proceed....


(blogger note: as usual all italicized text are anonymous comments/questions unless otherwise noted.)

Cognitive distortions are simply ways that our mind convinces us of something that isn’t really true. These inaccurate thoughts are usually used to reinforce negative thinking or emotions — telling ourselves things that sound rational and accurate, but really only serve to keep us feeling bad about ourselves. You're welcome! :)

I received this message early Tuesday morning prior to the Esquire article coming out and just left it thinking how best to answer this.  I looked at this comment/helpful information in two ways.  Either this anon was trying to diagnose me or was assisting me in diagnosing many of the FAINTERS.  I'm pretty certain I'm the patient being referred to...LOL...but really I have to thank my anon's assistance because I think this accurately illustrates what seems to be going on with some in this fandom at this time.  

I spoke with a friend that is a psychologist and sent her this little ditty and she agreed that my anon was attempting to diagnose me saying that I believe in my theory so much that I've convinced myself that it's true when in reality it's not...that I'm using my theory to protect me from some greater pain in my real life (LOL..real life is going great by the way!).  

Well I think in truth there is a greater portion of fans out there that are doing just this.  They see my theory and more than likely see the truth in it and in order to protect themselves from some greater personal pain have created elaborte "fantasy situations, shield" as my psychologist friend deemed it to protect themselves from bitter events and stituations in their lives.

So now we know what we are dealing with.  

And I believe it is these ppl that Esquire determined where their target audience for their article about Rob.  Did Esquire know all the ins and outs and issues that some of these fans face.  No...but they know that there are fans that don't like Kristen and discuss the incident of over two years ago incessintly. 

These are the ppl that Esquire handed Rob over to....

Here are some examples of some interesting anon's reactions to this interview....

Rob was excellent in his interview and made it clear without unnecessary drama that he and Kristen are not together and there is no "Love Child". He has always been a gentleman. As much as I am sad that this has all come to an end It's time to accept his words. He has set an example of kindness and I think it's time to say good bye to Robsten. The sooner we accept this the sooner we can focus on Rob and Kristen individually. Hope this can unite fans again.

well now he done it, he said what was on his mind, like it or not it can be all made up about this interview he spoke to a man who is his friend, he went to his house as a friend he talked to him as a friend why hi friend is going to tell lies about him? we better believe in his words[rob] now it is all over the news, tv there i no way out and he did it knowing what would happening soon , sorry for who still believ they are together sad but truei m glad she is far away from it God love you K

What's the point in all this? R/K could have privacy and be together IF they really wanted to. But they don't. And so the whole world-media, tabloids, &random people sightings- is helping them hiding this relationship/secret child? No one cares that much except desperate shippers (who are dropping by the hour) You all have gone so far you're seeing things that aren't there, and ignoring the truth.

I'm sure you had a conference with your friend HKN to find some sort of excuse for Robs interview. Doesn't matter..what he said, he said. If he didn't say it, he would sue the magazine. What matters is that there is No marriage and No a Sweet P and you and HKN are the laughing stock of the entire fandom on both sides of the coin. So until the Epic comes out, you are a fool and will always stay a fool.

Regardless of your beliefs about R/K, this BS has perpetuated itself bc it was left untouched by both parties. This has escalated due to the no response policy by RK. I can make a list of the reasons, but that is futile. A couple, bf/gf/ husband/wife and or father/mother would never let this mayhem ensue about each other. Most of it is downright hateful and vile. Use you deductive reasoning and there is only one conclusion.

She wasn't recently seen with his backpack and guitar. They had TWO backpacks, they were given multiples of many things like sunglasses, backpacks, jackets, etc. And he gave her his OLD guitar case several years ago. He got a new one. It's not rocket science. He didn't want it any more and gave it to her. They are not together and they haven't been for well over a year now. The interview is not fake, he knows what he's saying. He's done with her, and he's so much better off without a cheater.

To go after a journalist who graduated from Cambridge and has been doing this for many years and a reputable magazine is pathetic. Just like you.

I love that Esquire interview so much because it makes you mad. lol

Girl, it is so obvious that he's talking about his and K's breakup and K cheating on him when he says shit happens. So, sorry but I chose to believe that they are not together anymore.

just accept the fact that they are over. I

Rob mentioned where he currently lives and mentions his next door neighbor in the interview. He wouldn't mention his neighbor if he didn't live there. The evidence is mounting. So that solves the mystery of where he lives. Rob said he was single in another interview. He said he didn't have kids in this interview. It is pretty clear.

you are too delusional. then do you care to explain what rob was talkin about when he said "shit happens" ? he really said that you know, the magazine can't put something he didn't say.

So what are you trying to say? That the interviewer just made up the quotes? I don't think that they are allowed to write things that the person didn't say. Then what was Rob referring to when he said " shit happens" and "The hardest part was talking about it afterwards. Because when you talk about other people, it affects them in ways you can’t predict"?? I can't think of anything else rather than his breakup with K and the incident.

I think fans if rk need to stop reading these magz at all if u cant handle it.

Yeah you just keep saying that Rob is not gonna be happy when he sees the interview. If he had been so bothered with people who had been rude to Kris he would have done something so far. But he hasn't. The papz still harass her, the interviewers still say shit about her, the media still dismisses her. So I don't believe that Rob loves her enough to stop them talk shit about her. Or they are already over so Rob has nothing to do with Kris.

So these my dear minions are the comments that I received from the FAINTERS yesterday and early this morning.   I have a hard time taking any of these comments seriously.  These ppl call me delusional and yet they read this article and read things in it that are not there!

Yes, this article ticked me off, but less the article cause this is just another day ending in "y" in this fandom, but more because of this type of response.  More because ppl either read into what's not there or they don't read what is there.

I've mentioned plenty of times that y'all need to learn to read critically.  And here I'm talking to most all y'all as Reese Witherspoon would say.

I'm beginning to realize that many of you have no idea what I mean by that.  I think you think that I mean you should read things and then criticize them...and that's not what reading critically means at all.

So...a little lesson from Mama Nails...I was a former teacher you know...

What Is Critical Reading?

Note: These remarks are primarily directed at non-fictional texts.

Facts v. Interpretation
To non -critical readers, texts provide facts. Readers gain knowledge by memorizing the statements within a text.

To the critical reader, any single text provides but one portrayal of the facts, one individual’s “take” on the subject matter. Critical readers thus recognize not only what a text says, but also how that text portrays the subject matter. They recognize the various ways in which each and every text is the unique creation of a unique author.

A non-critical reader might read a history book to learn the facts of the situation or to discover an accepted interpretation of those events. A critical reader might read the same work to appreciate how a particular perspective on the events and a particular selection of facts can lead to particular understanding.
What a Text Says, Does, and Means: Reaching for an Interpretation

Non-critical reading is satisfied with recognizing what a text says and restating the key remarks.

Critical reading goes two steps further. Having recognized what a text says , it reflects on what the text does by making such remarks. Is it offering examples? Arguing? Appealing for sympathy? Making a contrast to clarify a point? Finally, critical readers then infer what the text, as a whole, means , based on the earlier analysis.

These three steps or modes of analysis are reflected in three types of reading and discussion:
What a text says – restatement
What a text does – description
What a text means – interpretation .

You can distinguish each mode of analysis by the subject matter of the discussion:
What a text says – restatement – talks about the same topic as the original text
What a text does – description – discusses aspects of the discussion itself
What a text means – interpretation — analyzes the text and asserts a meaning for the text as a whole

Goals of Critical Reading

Textbooks on critical reading commonly ask students to accomplish certain goals:
to recognize an author’s purpose
to understand tone and persuasive elements
to recognize bias

Notice that none of these goals actually refers to something on the page. Each requires inferences from evidence within the text:
recognizing purpose involves inferring a basis for choices of content and language
recognizing tone and persuasive elements involves classifying the nature of language choices
recognizing bias involves classifying the nature of patterns of choice of content and language

Critical reading is not simply close and careful reading. To read critically, one must actively recognize and analyze evidence upon the page.
Analysis and Inference: The Tools of Critical Reading

These web pages are designed to take the mystery out of critical reading. They are designed to show you what to look for ( analysis ) and how to think about what you find ( inference ) .

The first part —what to look for— involves recognizing those aspects of a discussion that control the meaning.

The second part —how to think about what you find— involves the processes of inference, the interpretation of data from within the text.

Recall that critical reading assumes that each author offers a portrayal of the topic. Critical reading thus relies on an examination of those choices that any and all authors must make when framing a presentation: choices of content, language, and structure. Readers examine each of the three areas of choice, and consider their effect on the meaning.

As any good teacher knows...don't reinvent the wheel if you don't have here you have it...critical reading 101....

so...let's go back and look as some of the comments above for a few giggles shall we?  Yes, Yes we shall!

O God...I went back up to read what they wrote and I can't...I just can't.  Their words speak for themselves.  I'm sure in their minds what they wrote makes perfect sense to them.  They read that article and just had a hay day... or more likely they saw some of our reactions to the article and just made assumptions based on our comments about what was in the article.  Because there's no way that these ppl actually READ the same article that I read.  NO WAY!

I particularly like the comments from my "friend" from Keller, TEXAS...yes there are some anon's who's writing stands out that I can tag their comments without even looking at my tracking information and she's one of them.  She's absolutely obsessed with my blog and what I say and I think that the diagnosis above might fit her to a T! would if I was actually doing armchair psychoanalysis...LOL

But this is the comment above that says that Rob did this interview with his friend....The writer clearly stated that though he'd interviewed Rob before Rob had no recollection of meeting him and the writer had him over to his home, not the other way around.  So clearly my friend from Texas didn't actually read the article or doesn't actually know how to read?  Not really sure.

Oh...and classic...I do have to make a comment about my anon who gave me grief for daring to disparage a writer that graduated from Cambridge!  So sorry.  I didn't know that there was something about graduating from Cambridge that gave writers a pass for laziness and a sloppy work ethic.  And frankly just slimy behavior.  This guy invited Rob to his home and then this is what he wrote?  REALLY?  

You anon may give him a pass for this, but I don't have to.

But...I will say I've already said before and will talk about in more detail below...the issues I have with this article may have nothing to do with the journalist.  The article that he originally turned in to his editor, if I ever have a chance to read it may be just the kind of article that I thought I would read in Esquire.  But as anyone who knows anything about the world of print media, that once a writer turns in his/her articles that's where their involvement ends and the editor can add and delete to their hearts content.

So the interviewer pieced together little things that R said and constructed a narrative around it that is bogus. And people buy it, and get called idiots. But that is precisely what you do! Making inferences from pictures, interpreting their friends' instagrams, looking at little coincidences, and constructing a narrative around it. And you call those things proof of that narrative. So how come when you do it, it's absolute truth? this I also received and this I will address independent of the rest of the riffraff.

But seriously, I'm a blogger...I'm not a well respected publication that's known for in-depth truthful interviews. Not to say that what I've posted on my blog isn't the truth because my followers know that I do believe that what I've discussed over the last several months is true and that I've recently received independent verification. I've basically done an in-depth investigation over the last few months. Noting details and facts along the way. You may disagree with my original premise and my conclusions but none the less this is what I've done.

Also...nothing that I've said put either Kristen or Rob in a bad light. If anything, what I've discussed speaks to their strength. Their fight to keep their private life private and their ability to do so even in light of my little blog and my "reporting". Their strength in fighting for their relationship over the objection of many "fans" or the FAINTERS.   
And just celebrating with them the newest non-furry member of their little family.

But when reading an article in Esquire, I expect a journalist that interviewed a subject to stick to the topics that were actually discussed during the interview. A journalist isn't really supposed to be piecing together a bogus narrative.  Unless this was some in-depth investigation they shouldn't be piecing together a narrative at all.   This interview was just supposed to be an interview to discuss Rob's upcoming projects.  As we all should know by now Rob's not going to ever do an interview where he shares personal details about his relationship with Kristen!


So...I read the article over again and here's the thing...I can interpret two possibilities...but only one truly makes the most sense to me.

First...let's say that Rob was discussing in a few of his quotes the "incident of 2012"  Well, if so I agree with my anon that said this:

wait whats wrong with what he said? shit happens thats normal and honestly who gives a shit? i thought its a good thing

I have to say, that when it comes to Rob's answers if you accept the writers set up to his quote as being in regards to the "incident of 2012" than really...what is everyone getting freaked out about? Why is anyone giving Rob grief about it? Cause frankly...shit does happen and if I were to interpret that quote in light of the incident than I would say that Rob is over it and he's telling everyone else to get over it.  However, those that want to say he's confirming that he and Kris are done...are reading into the quote what is not said!

But here's the deal.  As most of you know, I've been following Rob and Kristen for a bit now and I've read and seen most all of their interviews.  And the one consistent theme from both of them is that they don't discuss their personal relationships.   So why now would Rob suddenly decide to talk about his personal life and why would he talk about the "incident of 2012"?  

So I can't believe that that's the case with this interview.

Here's what I think happened.  I think that the journalist may very well have had a lovely time with Rob.  He may have tried to get in a few personal questions and I've no doubt that Rob stonewalled him at every turn.  He wrote the article and frankly phoned it in on several of the details.  Like Rob finishing up filming The Rover last summer.  Sorry, but where did he pull that tidbit of information from?  His ass??  It really wouldn't have taken him that much time to find that Rob returned to the US from Australia in March of 2013.  Did he confuse summer with spring?  Maybe not a huge mistake but big enough to put doubts in my mind.

Hey don't these kinds of publications have fact checkers?  You know ppl's who's job it is to verify the fucking facts in an article???  Hmmm....sleeping on the job I'd say!

But let's leave that mistake alone and just look at a perfectly appropriate article about his upcoming movies, how Rob is focusing on who he's working with in terms of directors more than the actual scripts themselves, his penchant for stretching the truth and making up absurd comments during interviews as well as a bit about how crazy everything was for him during the promotion of Twilight.   

He turns in the article to his editor and the editor reads it and just thinks "meh"...good article but we need a bit of drama.  What can we add to this to sell this issue.  What do Rob's fans want?  So if you're an editor and you really don't know the true craziness of this fandom and all it's various factions and really how can you if you aren't part of this craziness, where do you go?  What are you gonna do to find out who your audience is for this article?  You're gonna go online and look at some Rob fan blogs.  And anyone that's ever looked at Rob fan blogs knows what you are going to find.  Cause if the editor is smart, he(or she) isn't just going to see the content of the blog but also the comments.  That's where you are going to find your true audience.  And you and I both know the kind of comments you are going to find on 90% of Rob only blogs.  You are going to find 90% of the comments are going to be someone saying something negative about Kristen, because truly these ppl are obsessed with Kristen.  And you are going to find that in many of these comments about Kristen they are going to say something about the "incident of 2012"  because those ppl are determined to make sure that NO ONE is allowed to put this in the past and that Kristen has to wear a "Scarlet A" around her neck for the rest of her life!

So...if you are an editor seeing this gold mine what are you going to do?  You are going to add in comments about the "incident of 2012" and make sure you talk about Kristen.  Because that's what your audience wants to read about and those are the ppl that will buy this issue.

Your writer already took care of any license you are taking by talking about the fact that Rob lies in there you have it your perfect get out of jail free card to use if anyone questions the information included. issue is published with the perfect audience in mind that will unfortunately buy it hook line and sinker!


Kudos to my critical readers...
Here are comments from my readers that made the same observations as I did!

Hey Mama back from vaca woohoo! Anyway been catching up and I have something to add about the esquire article. Funny thing about his answer about shit happens was where was the question? The answers that weren't personal had questions. The supposed answers about personal stuff had no questions. Wonder what the question really was that elicited his answers? tbellretreat

I think The only parts that Robert really said are the Jimmy Fallon parte and few others. Stop. The rest of the interview is invented , for the most. He told them where he lives? He talks bad about Kris? No fucking way. This is not rob. This is the Robert pattinson that the media wants to make Us believe he is.

I don't take any interview as the gospel truth. And what I've seen of this one is the same crap in a different package. I'm not going to stress over it. I do think Rob needs to get a publicist to put a lid on two years ago. It's getting old and it isn't relevant. Why, do you think, that some people want to believe they were just pr and nothing more? Love you, Sherry

I think when Rob said that shit happens and something about being young, I think he is telling people to get over it like he has. And he won't talk about Kristen to hurt her in an way by talking about it. He wants people to move on about it but the crazies want him to publicly hang her....which is something he would never do. They want blood for Rob whereas Rob is over it and could care less what his so called fans want. The mags just feeds the haters. Rob really needs someone to stop the nuts.

I don't know if someone mentioned this but the actual "quote" (and I put it that way because unless I hear his voice saying the actual words I will believe it) doesn't sound like a coherent answer to any question regarding 07/2012, the part that resonates is "It's just young people" like...I don't know. I just don't feel he is answering something regarding Kristen and what happened, even if he would never talk about it. xo Anne.

Hey MN, I buckled and read the interview. I am glad I did because this so called interview pitiful. Only the last 4 para had any substance to the Rover, the rest was filler. Also, a lot was borderline plagiarism. I've heard and read every quote R and K have said and this article took some of them and twisted them to make a story about R and how he has risen above Twilight. His only interest was doing indie films. Right his interest was K staring in an indie film. fred4me2

R may have said the words "Shit happens" etc., but we don't know what he was answering, or the real context in which he said this. I think he was defending K and urging haters to let the past go - as he and K have. Instead, his comments have been taken out of context and haters are dizzy with glee, whilst trashtoids feed their frenzy whilst making even more money treating R&K like shit. I feel sorry for them both and R must feel like crap today. When will this shit ever stop. It stinks!

More comments

Everything in HW is orchestrated. His team knows exactly what they want to accomplish. They have an image in mind that they want to protest. Privacy my a--. They keep all this going for a reason. Keeps his name in the mags. HW is smoke and mirrors. All he had to do originally is make a yes/no statement that's what other celebs do. It's the end of it.

Yes..there is absolutely a lot of smoke and mirrors in HW...but not everything is smoke and mirrors and as for answering yes/no in an interview you've agreed to do...No my darling that's not the way it works! Plus, please tell me...what questions did this journalist ask Rob? Cause I see no list of questions. Just commentary from the writer leading into quotes that are supposed to coincide within the writers narrative, but we have no idea what Rob was actually asked to know how his quotes actually fit those questions. We also don't know if Rob was quoted correctly and if you think that quotes are not taken out of context or just flat misquoted you know nothing about the media!

And here's a comment that I think is quite pertinent to this particular discussion....

I always pretty much believed anything published interviews have said, until I was interviewed and read the published version. I was in a show and played the main character. I was interviewed by the news paper and I was horrified buy what I read. I didn't say half the things they published. Some of it was what my costar said but they put my name on the end of the quote. I told the director that I was misquoted and he said that they haven't got an interview right in years. Therefore don't take anything published too seriously. Until it comes from him speaking with his voice and going into your ear drums no one should worry about anything

I know there will be ppl that will believe that I made up this comment above and I wish the person had not made it anon but it truly did come to me just as you see it here. But I'm going to add to their comment and say that even in recorded interviews you have to be cautious about how the interview is edited. Make sure you are looking at the context and the full answer not just what is being said but how it's being said. This is even more important when dealing with Rob because as we all know, Rob has his special way of dealing with the media doubly so if discussing topics he doesn't want to discuss!

I dont understand why journalists feel the need to bash kristen it doesn't make rob look good its just a pathetic and underhanded way to sell more articles, i started to read the article and then just stopped when they mentioned the scandal i mean jesus they really don't have anything to go on so they bring up bull from what 2 years ago it just shows how poor this persons journalism skills are.

Me Neither!

Just asking MN will this story (Esquire) generate ANY interest now the Orlando Bloom/Justin Beiber incident has gone viral LOL! anyway I think I am done with this bullshit K is working on her 3rd film this year, with critical acclaim all around her. Rob has done equal to his life partner. Personal life is well + happy let the assholes speculate they have shit + THE Robsessed, fainters + haters Ha Ha u keep talking about K becuz U know in your heart in aint over btwn these 2 , Esq. as bad as THR

Since all I know about the Bloom/Beiber incident is the video I have no earthly idea what you think might be the correlation between these two events! for Kristen and Rob they are doing great professionally and personally I think that they are better than ever. At least I know that most new parents are tired but giddy about their new child!

Rob and Kristen are far from being over as much as there are those that wish this to be so!

These magazine articles aren't hurting Kristen. What are they going to say about Kristen that hasn't already been said? They're hurting Robert because they're letting 2-yr-old news take over articles about his current career. I've never heard any man say, "I'm going to see that man's movie because he & his girlfriend had problems." Who's actually talking about The Rover right now because of that article? If they believe his relationship is over, then y keep bringing it up? I'm sad for him.

I disagree, I think every time that the "incident of 2012" is brought up it hurts Kristen. Maybe not professionally since I think HW is smarter than we sometimes give it credit. At least it seems obvious from all the projects Kristen has in the can, currently in production and soon to filmed that she's doing just fine and whatever the fuck happened back in 2012 has had no bearing upon her career. 
  (interesting that that same event seems to have ruined another's career...I think that speaks loudly to who was seen in the industry as being more culpable! Just desserts if you ask me!)

But I will agree that I think that this does hurt Rob. You are right, the general public that might be drawn to one of Rob's new movies doesn't give a shit about his personal life. It's only us crazy fans that are hyper aware of his every move.

I am fascinated by how threatened ppl are by Kristen, what is their need to attack here, do they honestly think by insulting her, they automatically raise Rob's profile? that is so stupid, just fascinated why this stupid incident from so long ago carries so much weight in the media, Why were so many happy to see the so-called demise of RK, why did that bother them, why this obsession with attacking her? can anyone answer this question becuz I have seen many media stories come and go but not this

anon you pose so many good questions and I wish I had answers that were better than the ones I've been posing for months now. When it comes to the media I think that it's just that for them drama sells. But the larger picture as to who is threatened by Kristen? That is truly the $64M question. And to me I think maybe you just need to go back to the top of my post and see the comments there. Most of these ppl truly feel threatened by her it's obvious regarding the comments that they made.

Love your blog, Rob be a damn man, and put the stop to these fricken attacks on Kristen, So sick of her being the fricken punching bag to every wanna be writer in LIARWOOD!! 2012 is over and done with, stop the Trampire crap!! God, that pisses me off!! How about the next writer ask Rob, "How grateful are you that Kristen chose YOU, to go on this journey with her?" BTW, By her being mentioned in every fricken written so called interview, she totally owns their asses!!! Bow down Bitches!!

I think that if there was truly something to be gained Rob would speak up. But as I've said so many times he and Kristen are caught between a rock and a hard place. Damned if they do and damned if they don't. 

I totally agree that the "trampire" comment in the interview was totally unnecessary. But I would remind ppl...go back and watch Will Farrell again. Actually LISTEN to what he is saying and who his comment is actually directed at. He's not making fun of Kristen with this comment. He's making fun of all the robsessed/FAINTERS and doing it much so that they don't even pick up on his utter disdain for them and making really NOTHING into way more than it EVER was!

But you are right about Kristen owning their asses! Just like I've said several times, the robsessed/FAINTERS were Esquires chosen audience for this article and we've all known for years that Kristen owns their asses!

carowren said:  Keep sharps away from me. As one who taught how to separate fact from fiction and differentiate between sources from others who have nothing to gain, I just might cut my throat. I can not believe Anon who thinks every thing she reads in any magazine must be the truth.I notice that foreign journalists seem to have the most trouble writing credible information gained directly from R. R's management do not control what is said. R trolls out of self defense. He needs a publicist to stop the probes.

This is what I've wanted to read for ages. I was upset how Kristen was treated after the pictures came out and the did regard for the fact that it happened 2 years ago. I like the idea they are still together with a family. Esquire is for twits. Rob has even admitted he makes things up so people don't know about his life. And Kristen never tells. The press are fuelling sick fantasies from Robs fans that disregard Kristen and it makes me mad. But I bet she could not give a shit I'm glad x

I don't know. I feel differently about the article. Rob said (and has said before) that he is making a conscious effort to stay out of the toids. What better way for both K and him to do that than to have "legit" mags sell it? That way interest in them as a couple dies down and they can start living more normal lives. The real fans will always know the truth just like we did from the beginning, and still know now.

I'm sorry, but I can't see Rob every agreeing to do this! If that's what this article was meant to do this billed it wrong and it should have only focused on that and the truth is the article was disjointed and was all over the place without any true focus!

MN I need to vent. I am a bit annoyed that everyone is running with the esquire article and framing it around the incident - thought a bit more about yahoo but now I know. Many will have egg on their face when the truth comes out! Time to egg the nonnies, tabs and all.

immsjessel said:  I dunno. I just find it unusual. It seems like its not Rob. Its like there is a different person talking. Its not the usual Robert-sque kind of interview. The funny answers. Ugh. I cant explain it. I just think something is wrong in the interview. Plus, whenever its about K haters are always there. What is it about K that they hate so much? Oohh I know a certain man that they can never have. A good life. A love life. Success. Happiness. They are a bunch of envy trolls.

Hi Phronsie! Well this Esquire's interview make noise didn't it ! All this (the drama and lies etc) is exactly the reason I stopped getting excited to read ANY R's written interviews since the Dior's campaign! Even then they were getting on my nerves so much ALWAYS bringing up K and the past !!! With or without her, she's always mentioned, each and every single time ! Like I said before K should be the one getting paid by the mags for the promo and stuff because it's all about her ! Anabelle

Interviews are half truths. You agree to talk about work not your personal life unless you WANT to talk about it. He didn't give the interviewer a lot to go on, hence bringing up K many times. So whatever shit is written or thrown at her, she rises.

Sorry Rob's mgmt does not get final approval on what goes in those articles. He has complained in the past about being misquoted in interviews. Do people really think Mr. I Don't Sell My Private Life would've been ok with all the personal details in this article?

christine51us said:  Well I read the article and I knew before the I was thru the first paragraph that it was going to be full of BS. I think all of your followers should go to there site and tell them what they think of there article. I know I'm going to look it up and do just that. I think the only way they will ever do a story that isn't full of BS is to protest. If enough of his and Kristen's fans do it will stop.

I wholeheartedly agree! I certainly hope that anyone that is a fan and true supporter of the two of these great talents will not run out and buy this and will go and let Esquire know that they did a shoddy job on this article and they missed the mark on who their true audience is regarding Rob. So I would encourage all my followers to share your feelings with Esquire!

My Lovers!

Love you and keep up the good fight. I would like to think that Rob and Kristen got marrried on the Isle of Wight during his two month visit home since they spent some time there. In late autumn early winter last year was the longest period that Rob stayed with his famiy in recent years so maybe he with his family's help co-ordinate the wedding.

loveinstar said:  I just read your last Q&A posts hun. So many are crazed out from some interview Rob had. Honestly, I don't bother to read them. Like I told you before, I am not so much into the social life of stars. But I love RK+baby. I love your blog. It's a blessing bc, I can see what you see. Sadly we all know how the media loves to squeeze and press everything into a light that fit the tabloids like said interview. So when I want to know something, I have your blog <3♥

HI!!! I just want to say your posts make me really happy. *giggles*

Wow everyday is always a drama in this fandom. Take a rest mama you deserve've done enough answering these hateful comments from people. Seriously let them talk and make fool of themselves, they'll got tired eventually

I think after this post, I'm gonna put to rest the topic of this article and that you are right I do deserve a rest!


I don't know about y'all but if this article proved anything to me at all it's either that the robsessed/Fainters need some serious therapy or they are feeling the shaking ground upon which they are walking and it's making them a bit pissy!

What do you think?

Until the next drama ensues....
(damn I wonder how long my hands have to recuperate??)


  1. Heeeyyyy Mama!!! Love this epic post!! The haters., fainters, robsessed, and general idiots can all go to hell as far as I'm concerned. Fuck off Esquire magazine. I hope your readership turns into a negative number. You are one of the few voices of reason in this fandom, MN!!! I love you hard!!! XXOO

  2. HI MN: You deserve a gold medal for this..but then again, you ALWAYS deserve a gold medal for all your work. I want to say on behalf of all womanhood how insulting it is to see Kristen being backstabbed once again for a clusterfuck that happened two years ago and was basically nothing. Do you EVER see a male celebrity EVER getting raked over the coals over and over again by the media? No, they get a blue ribbon pinned to their chests for being "Boys will be boys". I'm sick to death of this, and this is the 21st century.
    Kristen is my hero and shall ever remain so and Rob is one lucky man to have her. After all, she chose him...
    Shame on the should all go to hell.

  3. MN you settled this issue as far as I'm concerned...I think along with critical thinking they should learn comprehension and a modicum of common sense may also help.
    Love you, Love your blog, love your strength as a woman of high principles who takes no prisoners. Keep going you are doing a fantastic job.

  4. I love you hard Mama but I had to stop half way through the critical thinking lesson and go back to my college self to understand lol. But once I did I got it and completely understood what you were doing. Its just sad that supposed legit publications have lowered themselves to tabloid journalism to make a profit nowadays. Kudos to you sweet lady for taking the time to spell it out! Mwah

  5. Love it!
    All this proof is that the Robssesed had never being Rob fans but Kristen haters. The guy has told time and time again that he is not interesting on selling his personal life wouldn't allow to talk about a personal incident that happened 2 freak years ago, but if an interview serves their purposes of belittle Kris they eat it up. Some fans.
    Great post as usual.

  6. Thank you so much for this detailed analysis on the mis-informed and the not-so-intelligent, that ate this article up. I should have picked up on the sarcasm Will Ferrell was showing two years ago and probably only a few like yourself picked up on, that he was making fun of the Robsessed that made it sound like they had a personal interest in what happened-AKA Nutty Madam. LOL! So again I thank you so much for showing us the hypocracy of this article, however we know the Robsessed will try to peddle it as their bible and we have to be ready to shut that noise out as well.

  7. The Esquire magazine is sold out, They won! Their accomplishment is controversy. That's why R/K sell. Anything that is said about them is a goldmine.

  8. MN, this was one of your greatest posts. There was lots of information from which fans can learn something really important. It goes without saying that that Esq article was a crock of shit, meant to skirt around Robs current projects to include old tired gossip like the "incident of 2013", & Rob trying to detract from Twilight . Please! Those who know how he operates KNOW his private life is taboo. Any article and/or interviewer who dwells on this is immediately known to be irrelevant. I love who he messes with interviewers who keep bringing Kristen up . Notice they never bring up any other women. That's because our Rob is a "one-woman man". His words. MN- you rock!

  9. Sorry, folks- missed key- meant "Incident of 2012". Not 2013.

  10. Well I did go on twitter and let them know what I thought. I hope that others did the same. I can't believe how many of the anon believe any of that article. Have they never read or seen one of his interviews where he says I don't discuss my personal life.Remember the Goodmorning American show in 2012 he said I'm here to promote my movie not my personal life. He says that all the time. I think them anons needs to get a life and quit waiting for Rob to come and be with them. This Christine51 It won't let me post as that on here.

  11. Hey Mama N! You out did yourself on this one! My goodness what a BLOG! You can write circles around that Cambridge guy. Just because this guy attended Cambridge doesn't give him the license to write inaccuracies and embellish an article to sell untruths to the fans who buy it just because of Robert Pattinson.. People say Rob saw the article before it went to print, WRONG, that's not how it works. Thank goodness this is not for sale on the news stands in the U.S. If it is sold in your area,my apologies. Once again, Brilliant my friend!!

  12. Tearing my hair out!! Third time lucky sending you a comment today better work!
    My take on all this is - Rob would NEVER EVER disrespect Kristen or their relationship. He is not that kind of man as anyone who knows him will clearly say. Rob has also told us from his own mouth he is not an idiot to talk about his private life. That interview was crafted to gain trust from the gullible and make the general public assume Rob finally caved & gave private deets. Enrages me to know so many will get sucked in and believe this crap.
    Hey I applaud you for all you do in our fandom - this post is magnificent work.
    Your loyalty & steadfast determination to honesty & common decency is our gain. I'm late to tell you how ecstatic I am you have experts to back you up, to back us up. They found someone to trust with their identity & I know you won't let them down. Waving my banner from your minion cheer squad!!

  13. Hi Mama Nails! I love this. Great job! Hi Tbell, Morning Coffee, RKP, Bunny from Texas, Chris b, a stargazzer, Marion, Gigi Cullen, ASFJ, and the rest. I hope you all don't mind I could join here too. I love your comments. Great job! Well, Its late! I am going to bed now. Night!

  14. This is a great post Mama, very well put together and well answered, Good job ! Take your much deserved rest !
    I'll only say those last things about this crappy interview : Rob need to rethink his management, he really need a publicist like asap. It's not much about how the magazine won because it sold out, money never smell good ever, but more about how R is perceived now, they make him look like a manwhore, bashing on his supposedly ex. This game can't last very long . Getting out of tabs but giving interviews to "legit" magazines that write as bad articles as them is just a waste of his time and in the end will hurt him and more importantly people he cares about in the process.

  15. Yeah, that "It's just young people" comment is so weird if he meant Kristen and Rupert Sanders.... Sanders was in his early 40s in 2012... hardly a "young person" (unless Rob means you're off the hook till you're in your 60s, lol)

  16. First of all, good post. You really do have a knack with words.
    Scrolling through the comments & does that one know that the magazine has sold out.....sold out where exactly? I haven't seen anything where it has been said that it was sold out.
    I can honestly say that I have had my fill on this over this interview. Have pondered why this one seems so different from all the ones we've seen since last summer until now......with all those Dior articles and the ones we have now....with The Rover. If you think it about it...this one sticks out like a sore thumb & doesn't seem like Rob at all. Kind of like that Sesame Street game....which one of these is not like the others......or a puzzle piece that just doesn't fit. And just because someone has a degree from a college such as Cambridge.....doesn't mean squat......that is all it is a degree.....and with how this article was written, saying he graduated from there.....doesn't match up either now does it? There is nothing intelligent or witty in that article to indicate a degree from said college. JMO Cause with him saying such things, I'd expect more from him than a "college boy mentality" as it comes off in this one particular article. When I think about the one done on line with The Vent or the one from the Italian magazine.....which both were professional & seemed more like Rob.....this one pales in comparison.....someone or some people on the staff need remedial courses in interviewing techniques, researching their subject matter & really understanding their audience better.....cause they stuck out on each one of those.